Unemployment Cases
Jobseekers Allowance Case 1:
Question at issue: Genuinely Seek Work
Jobseekers Allowance Case 2:
Question at issue: Genuinely Seek Work
Jobseekers Allowance Case 3:
Question at issue: Overpayment of Unemployment Assistance for days on which it is alleged that the appellant was working.
Jobseekers Allowance Means Case 1:
Question at issue: Failure to show that means do not exceed statutory limit.
Jobseekers Allowance Means Case 2:
Question at issue: Whether the appellant’s means were correctly assessed having been based on ‘benefit and privilege’ derived from his parent’s income.
Jobseekers Allowance (Habitual Residence) Case 1:
Question at issue: Whether the appellant may be deemed to be habitually resident in the State for purposes of his Unemployment Assistance claim.
Jobseekers Allowance (Habitual Residence) Case 2:
Question at issue: Whether the appellant may be deemed to be habitually resident in the State for purposes of his Unemployment Assistance claim.
Jobseekers Allowance (Habitual Residence) Case 3:
Question at issue: Whether the appellant may be deemed to be habitually resident in the State for purposes of his Unemployment Assistance claim.
Jobseekers Allowance (Habitual Residence) Case 4:
Question at issue: Whether the appellant's claim for Jobseekers Allowance should be disallowed on the grounds that he was not habitually resident in the State.
Jobseekers Benefit Case 1:
Question at issue: Availability for work.
Jobseekers Benefit Case 2:
Question at issue: Nine-week disqualification
Jobseekers Benefit Case3:
Question at issue: Whether the rate of graduated Unemployment Benefit – determined with reference to specified limits – is correct.
Jobseekers Benefit Case 4:
Question at issue: Whether claims for jobseekers benefit from a number of appellants in the same circumstances should be disallowed on the grounds that they were not available for work.
